Borrowed authority
Evaluate the acting agent, initiating person or workload, task and permitted resource together.
Govern existing AI agents & resources
Let AI agents act.
Keep control of the
actions that matter.
Your agents already call real systems. Route consequential actions through Frozion over MCP or HTTPS to apply agent identity, business policy, required human review and a connected execution record.
Keep the framework your team uses. Connect the protected operations to Frozion through tool routing, scoped credentials or supported integrations, then enforce the rules where those actions take effect.
Your existing agentSupplier update proposedA request to change bank details
FROZIONExecution FabricGoverned from request to outcome
Frozion governance boundary✓Identity & delegated scope
✓Business policy
Approval for this changeRequired
Hold the operation until its requirements are satisfied.
Your enterprise systemNo update attempted while approval is missing.
Keep your existing agentsPreserve delegated authorityEnforce business policyInspect the outcome
Existing-agent governance across your adoption path
Govern existing agents
Route selected actions through Frozion while retaining your existing agent framework.
Grow tools into workflows
Extend the governed operation into a process with rules, review and durable waits.
Build native agents
Reuse the same controls when you also build agents natively in Frozion.
Build systems of engagement
Add application experiences around the governed business process as participation grows.
The problem this solves
Your agents have access. Do they have the right authority?
A shared service credential can give an agent more reach than the task requires. Prompt instructions alone cannot bind that access to a current business decision.
Rules beyond the prompt
Apply policy when the protected operation is requested, even if a prompt asks for something else.
Review with a record
Hold sensitive changes for the authorized reviewer and retain the decision, attempt and destination result.
01 / Governance at the point of action
A useful agent becomes
an operational actor.
A valid credential doesn’t settle whether this actor may perform this operation, on this resource, for this purpose.
Agents can retrieve records, propose changes and delegate work. Authority, context and the attempted operation need to be evaluated together before a protected action proceeds.
Access the right records.
A service agent may need the assigned case, without access to unrelated accounts or confidential fields.
Separate proposal from permission.
Being allowed to draft a change does not grant authority to commit it to the ERP or CRM.
Control where data goes.
Permission to summarize records does not automatically allow bulk downloads or an external destination.
Keep the scope intact.
Calling another agent or a privileged tool should not silently expand the initiating task’s authority.
Keep the investment. Define the boundary.
Add control where actions take effect.
Connect the operations that matter to an enforceable Frozion path. Integration may require changes to tool routing, credentials or connectors. Your identity provider and business systems retain their records and native controls.
- Enforced
- The configured path can hold or deny an operation before its protected effect.
- Observed
- Activity may be visible without a control point that can stop the effect.
- Outside coverage
- Other routes and credentials need their own controls; logging does not close a bypass.
02 / From request to protected business action
One agent request.
An accountable outcome.
A supplier asks to change bank details before an invoice is paid. Your existing agent gathers the permitted evidence and proposes the change. Frozion evaluates the operation at the configured boundary.
Missing authority or approval means the update cannot proceed through this path.
The record of that decision matters just as much as the record of an allowed operation.
Case explorer
A supplier bank-detail update
What the record showsNot inspected
Inspect the selected condition.
Compare the authority, policy and approval checks with the operation attempt and reported result.
- Current authority
- Pending inspection
- Resource scope
- Pending inspection
- Business policy
- Pending inspection
- Exact approval
- Pending inspection
Operation attemptNot inspected
Destination resultNot inspected
What happens next
Inspect this case to see the next step.
Request / 01–03
Make the proposal specific.
- Capture the task and accountable initiator.
- Resolve only permitted context.
- Identify the record, fields and intended change.
Decide / 04–05
Apply the right decision.
- Evaluate authority and business policy.
- Bind required approval to the proposal and its evidence.
Execute / 06
Attempt the permitted action.
- Revalidate conditions, invoke through the boundary and capture the response.
Evidence / 07
Inspect the complete record.
- Follow the request, decisions, attempted action and reported result together.
03 / A focused path to proof
A pilot with one agent,
one action, one system.
Bring one agent you already run, one consequential action it takes and one system it writes to. Agree the authority, review conditions and evidence the pilot should demonstrate.
One existing agentOne consequential actionOne destination system
Supplier & finance data
Require authority and review for sensitive vendor, bank or payment-record changes.
Customer & service operations
Distinguish reading a case from issuing a refund or changing an entitlement.
Enterprise data & export
Apply resource and purpose boundaries to summaries, downloads and outbound actions.
IT & operational workflows
Separate advisory analysis from configuration, access or service changes.
Select the operation.
Choose a meaningful action and a testable response from the system of record.
Define the authority.
Identify the initiator, permitted scope, data boundaries and required approvals.
Enforce and test.
Show legitimate and prohibited paths, including changed conditions and routes that could bypass enforcement.
Inspect the outcome.
Trace the decision, attempt and destination response. Check user experience and operational impact.
See the control work across different paths.
Demonstrate an allowed action, a review requirement, a decision approved with FIDO2 and a denial. Recheck authority after a wait, then inspect one connected record for each path.
After the pilotKeep the foundation.
Keep the foundation.
Grow the scope.
Reuse common identity, policy, approval and evidence services as more work comes into scope. Each use case still needs its own permissions and integration design.
Govern / You are here
Control one existing action.
Establish the boundary and prove its behavior.
Extend
Connect more governed work.
Bring additional agents, resources and actions into configured coverage.
Build
Add the complete application.
Bring interfaces, trusted data and durable workflows around the business process.
Explore business applicationsThis is one possible expansion path. You can also begin directly with application development.
04 / Connected controls
Carry the decision
all the way to action.
Identity, policy, human judgment and evidence belong in the same business context.
A trusted agent still needs permission for this action.
Keep the initiator, agent, task and delegated permissions connected, and recheck current authority before action.
Identity & SecurityTurn operating policy into a condition of execution.
Apply explicit business conditions and data boundaries to the requested operation.
Visual Policy BuilderApprove a specific change, with the evidence to decide.
Give assigned reviewers the exact proposal and evidence; return their decision to the waiting workflow.
HITL InboxReconstruct what mattered when an action is questioned.
Connect the request, decisions, attempt and reported result so teams can inspect what happened.
Execution evidenceShared controls for the agents you already run.
Stop further action
Use the kill switch to stop further governed actions, or revoke access to a specific resource. Earlier effects remain in the record.
Explore identity controlsUse the history in the next decision
Evaluate activity-derived facts such as recent refunds, supplier payments or records read at the next governed action. Concurrent reads are not an atomic reservation.
Rules that know the historyGrow a tool into a workflow
Expose a protected call over MCP, then visually extend it with durable steps, policy and review as the work grows.
Explore visual orchestration05 / Questions enterprise teams ask
Make the boundary
clear from the start.
Know the integration requirements, the controls that can be enforced and the evidence available for review.
No. Frozion can govern supported actions without replacing your agent framework. The integration may still require changes to tool routing, credentials, a gateway or a connector. The pilot defines those changes and tests the actual enforcement point.
Governance applies to registered agents and protected resource operations routed through configured integration boundaries. Establish which actions are enforceable, which are observable and which remain outside coverage. This does not imply automatic discovery or control of every agent or MCP server.
Prompts ask the agent to behave. Frozion enforces the rule at the moment of a governed action, outside the model’s judgment. Protected operations must be routed through that enforcement boundary.
Yes. Use enterprise SSO or Frozion’s built-in identity with FIDO2 passkeys. Agents have their own identity and owner. Your systems of record keep their native records and controls.
The governed operation is held for an authorized reviewer. Approval is tied to the specific proposed change and its evidence. Relevant requirements are checked again before action; a changed proposal or revoked authority cannot rely indefinitely on an earlier approval.
Show that a legitimate operation can proceed, a prohibited operation is stopped before its protected effect, and approval requirements are respected. Inspect the request, authority, policy, decision, attempt and destination response. Test changed conditions, uncertain results and the limits of coverage for the selected integration.
They are independent starting points on the same platform. This offering begins with existing agents and tools. App Builder uses the same underlying identity, policy, approval and evidence services for complete applications with interfaces, business data and long-running workflows. Either offering can come first.
This page focuses on authority, business policy, human approval and execution evidence around consequential actions. These controls complement threat detection, posture management and incident response. Specific interoperability and any additional security capabilities need evaluation against the current release and your environment.
No. Agents can call Frozion over MCP or HTTPS. A registered tool, workflow or agent can be invoked over MCP, while the caller keeps its existing framework.
Yes. The kill switch stops further actions through the governed path. Specific resource access can also be revoked. Earlier attempts and reported effects stay in the execution record; stopping the agent does not undo them.
One governed foundation
Bring the agent action
you worry about most.
Define the protected operation, the authority and policies it needs, and the evidence that will show what happened.